So, anyone who doesn't believe in Evolution, a mere scientific hypothesis, not even a theory (can't be a theory–there is no evidence, historical or empirical, to back it up) you are Anti-Science? Why do evolutionists equate evolution with science, when it takes science a few steps back to the age of Aristotle, when science was merely philosophy? That is ignorance sir. Everything you have posted is merely a fantasy not based on fact. I want you to post your best evidence that proves evolution.

"If your God intelligently created life, than maybe you should at least consider that he might have snapped his fingers and rather than a bird suddenly appearing on the branch, he caused a series of events to occur that allowed a bird to evolve."

God has told us how He did it in the bible:

And God said, "Let the land produce living creatures according to their kinds: livestock, creatures that move along the ground, and wild animals, each according to its kind." And it was so.

God doesn't need evolution. Science doesn't need evolution.

Jesus said:

"But at the beginning of creation God made them male and female."

Male and female from the beginning. That solves your asexual to sexual problem.

The EVOLUTION of sexual reproduction is a different story. You say "Remember evolution is an unguided unintelligent process. All of these factors have to be in play at the same time otherwise the 'species' fails to reproduce and dies off." Evolution does not claim that one day, poof, all systems involved in sexual reproduction suddenly evolved at once. (Hence the term evolution). There are many evolutionary benefits to reproducing sexually so over the course of billions of years life slowly adapted to achieve the greatest reproductive benefits. The mutations may have been random, but only the beneficial mutations stuck around.

For argument's sake, lets just say you have never been told about the existence of a supreme being. Looking at all that modern science has developed and deciphered, you cannot tell me that you would logically jump to these same conclusions. Just because you don't understand precisely how something came to be, would you really just assume that someone must have placed it there for you?

Your sort of ignorance and refusal to accept science is exactly what will destroy progress. Looking at the evidence of evolution and accepting that it provides a good, scientific explanation of the development of life is all I ask. You do not have to sacrifice your faith to do this. If your God intelligently created life, than maybe you should at least consider that he might have snapped his fingers and rather than a bird suddenly appearing on the branch, he caused a series of events to occur that allowed a bird to evolve. You don't have to condemn science because of your beliefs.

Please tell me how all these factors evolved at the same time:

- Female is born with eggs already with her chromosomes inside.
- Female releases only one egg per cycle.
- Man producing semen with his chromosomes inside.
- Man being able to pass semen out of his body.
- Sperm must be able to swim.
- Seminal fluids contain fructose sugar providing the sperm with energy on its long journey to the ovum.
- The vagina is strongly acidic to prevent bacterial infection. It is a hostile environment for sperm (the seminal fluids counteract this acidity by producing alkaline to protect the semen).
- Gametes (the male sperm and the female egg) contain only half the normal number of chromosomes, 23 instead of 46.
- Sperm has correct enzyme on head that can penetrate egg wall.
- Sperm and egg must fuse so that their nuclei become one.
- Fertilized egg must attach to the uterus wall.
- It will also continue to produce progesterone which stabilises conditions inside the uterus until birth.
- Placenta.
- Umbilical cord.
- Woman produces milk that has everything the baby needs.

(The points above don't even cover how a creature would go from asexual to sexual. Hormones. X and Y chromosomes etc) it's a bit more than russian roulette sir. It is a highly complex process.

Remember evolution is an unguided unintelligent process. All of these factors have to be in play at the same time otherwise the 'species' fails to reproduce and dies off.

This is the point I am trying to get across to you. You have to have a huge amount of faith to believe that this happened by chance. Do you agree?

O and thanks for questioning this because I never realised how incredible this process is!

Just because you can't understand the process by which something evolved doesn't, doesn't mean that some being designed it. Do you really think this process that quite resembles Russian Roulette was really designed? If you were god, would you leave all of those things up to chance?