<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for thebibleisthewordofgod.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebibleisthewordofgod.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebibleisthewordofgod.com</link>
	<description>The bible is the word of God</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 17:09:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on God created the plants and trees before He created the Sun? by Rashid Masih</title>
		<link>http://thebibleisthewordofgod.com/2009/06/god-created-the-plants-and-trees-before-he-created-the-sun/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Rashid Masih</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 17:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebibleisthewordofgod.com/?p=89#comment-55</guid>
		<description>I agree with the Bible and believe it because God already had created light on the first day, and also If we believe that God is ALMIGHTY than we dont need any more explanation that how it happened all, In Romans Paul says&#168;that God can call those who are not there as they were there&#168;&#180; Logicaly it is enough that Bible says the Light was already created on the day one. The most important thing for any body to know about Creation story of the Bible is &#180;&#180;That it is the summury of many many summeries for us to know a bit that how God made all this&#168;&#180; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the Bible and believe it because God already had created light on the first day, and also If we believe that God is ALMIGHTY than we dont need any more explanation that how it happened all, In Romans Paul says&uml;that God can call those who are not there as they were there&uml;&acute; Logicaly it is enough that Bible says the Light was already created on the day one. The most important thing for any body to know about Creation story of the Bible is &acute;&acute;That it is the summury of many many summeries for us to know a bit that how God made all this&uml;&acute;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Creation Evidence by futureisbright</title>
		<link>http://thebibleisthewordofgod.com/evolution/creation-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>futureisbright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 00:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebibleisthewordofgod.com/?page_id=36#comment-49</guid>
		<description>The system God created works fine. It is too complex to be the product of an evolutionary process. 
 
So, anyone who doesn&#039;t believe in Evolution, a mere scientific hypothesis, not even a theory (can&#039;t be a theory--there is no evidence, historical or empirical, to back it up) you are Anti-Science? Why do evolutionists equate evolution with science, when it takes science a few steps back to the age of Aristotle, when science was merely philosophy? That is ignorance sir. Everything you have posted is merely a fantasy not based on fact. I want you to post your best evidence that proves evolution. 
 
&quot;If your God intelligently created life, than maybe you should at least consider that he might have snapped his fingers and rather than a bird suddenly appearing on the branch, he caused a series of events to occur that allowed a bird to evolve.&quot; 
 
God has told us how He did it in the bible: 
 
And God said, &quot;Let the land produce living creatures according to their kinds: livestock, creatures that move along the ground, and wild animals, each according to its kind.&quot; And it was so. 
 
God doesn&#039;t need evolution. Science doesn&#039;t need evolution. 
 
Jesus said: 
 
&quot;But at the beginning of creation God made them male and female.&quot; 
 
Male and female from the beginning. That solves your asexual to sexual problem.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The system God created works fine. It is too complex to be the product of an evolutionary process. </p>
<p>So, anyone who doesn&#039;t believe in Evolution, a mere scientific hypothesis, not even a theory (can&#039;t be a theory&#8211;there is no evidence, historical or empirical, to back it up) you are Anti-Science? Why do evolutionists equate evolution with science, when it takes science a few steps back to the age of Aristotle, when science was merely philosophy? That is ignorance sir. Everything you have posted is merely a fantasy not based on fact. I want you to post your best evidence that proves evolution. </p>
<p>&quot;If your God intelligently created life, than maybe you should at least consider that he might have snapped his fingers and rather than a bird suddenly appearing on the branch, he caused a series of events to occur that allowed a bird to evolve.&quot; </p>
<p>God has told us how He did it in the bible: </p>
<p>And God said, &quot;Let the land produce living creatures according to their kinds: livestock, creatures that move along the ground, and wild animals, each according to its kind.&quot; And it was so. </p>
<p>God doesn&#039;t need evolution. Science doesn&#039;t need evolution. </p>
<p>Jesus said: </p>
<p>&quot;But at the beginning of creation God made them male and female.&quot; </p>
<p>Male and female from the beginning. That solves your asexual to sexual problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Creation Evidence by Frank</title>
		<link>http://thebibleisthewordofgod.com/evolution/creation-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebibleisthewordofgod.com/?page_id=36#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Yes.  It&#039;s a well evolved and complex process.   However, I still want to restate that I think the PROCESS of reproduction relies on a lot of luck - there are many points at which it could go wrong and no offspring is produced.  Why wouldn&#039;t God create a system that is a little less reliant on chance? 
 
The EVOLUTION of sexual reproduction is a different story.  You say &quot;Remember evolution is an unguided unintelligent process. All of these factors have to be in play at the same time otherwise the &#039;species&#039; fails to reproduce and dies off.&quot;   Evolution does not claim that one day, poof, all systems involved in sexual reproduction suddenly evolved at once.  (Hence the term evolution). There are many evolutionary benefits to reproducing sexually so over the course of billions of years life slowly adapted to achieve the greatest reproductive benefits.   The mutations may have been random, but only the beneficial mutations stuck around.   
 
For argument&#039;s sake, lets just say you have never been told about the existence of a supreme being.  Looking at all that modern science has developed and deciphered, you cannot tell me that you would logically jump to these same conclusions.  Just because you don&#039;t understand precisely how something came to be, would you really just assume that someone must have placed it there for you?   
 
Your sort of ignorance and refusal to accept science is exactly what will destroy progress.  Looking at the evidence of evolution and accepting that it provides a good, scientific explanation of the development of life is all I ask.  You do not have to sacrifice your faith to do this.  If your God intelligently created life, than maybe you should at least consider that he might have snapped his fingers and rather than a bird suddenly appearing on the branch, he caused a series of events to occur that allowed a bird to evolve.  You don&#039;t have to condemn science because of your beliefs.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.  It&#039;s a well evolved and complex process.   However, I still want to restate that I think the PROCESS of reproduction relies on a lot of luck &#8211; there are many points at which it could go wrong and no offspring is produced.  Why wouldn&#039;t God create a system that is a little less reliant on chance? </p>
<p>The EVOLUTION of sexual reproduction is a different story.  You say &quot;Remember evolution is an unguided unintelligent process. All of these factors have to be in play at the same time otherwise the &#039;species&#039; fails to reproduce and dies off.&quot;   Evolution does not claim that one day, poof, all systems involved in sexual reproduction suddenly evolved at once.  (Hence the term evolution). There are many evolutionary benefits to reproducing sexually so over the course of billions of years life slowly adapted to achieve the greatest reproductive benefits.   The mutations may have been random, but only the beneficial mutations stuck around.   </p>
<p>For argument&#039;s sake, lets just say you have never been told about the existence of a supreme being.  Looking at all that modern science has developed and deciphered, you cannot tell me that you would logically jump to these same conclusions.  Just because you don&#039;t understand precisely how something came to be, would you really just assume that someone must have placed it there for you?   </p>
<p>Your sort of ignorance and refusal to accept science is exactly what will destroy progress.  Looking at the evidence of evolution and accepting that it provides a good, scientific explanation of the development of life is all I ask.  You do not have to sacrifice your faith to do this.  If your God intelligently created life, than maybe you should at least consider that he might have snapped his fingers and rather than a bird suddenly appearing on the branch, he caused a series of events to occur that allowed a bird to evolve.  You don&#039;t have to condemn science because of your beliefs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Creation Evidence by futureisbright</title>
		<link>http://thebibleisthewordofgod.com/evolution/creation-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>futureisbright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebibleisthewordofgod.com/?page_id=36#comment-47</guid>
		<description>First of all you didn&#039;t explain anything about evolution, you are just stating how the reproductive system works. 
 
Please tell me how all these factors evolved at the same time: 
 
- Female is born with eggs already with her chromosomes inside. 
- Female releases only one egg per cycle. 
- Man producing semen with his chromosomes inside. 
- Man being able to pass semen out of his body. 
- Sperm must be able to swim. 
- Seminal fluids contain fructose sugar providing the sperm with energy on its long journey to the ovum. 
- The vagina is strongly acidic to prevent bacterial infection. It is a hostile environment for sperm (the seminal fluids counteract this acidity by producing alkaline to protect the semen). 
- Gametes (the male sperm and the female egg) contain only half the normal number of chromosomes, 23 instead of 46. 
- Sperm has correct enzyme on head that can penetrate egg wall. 
- Sperm and egg must fuse so that their nuclei become one. 
- Fertilized egg must attach to the uterus wall. 
- It will also continue to produce progesterone which stabilises conditions inside the uterus until birth. 
- Placenta. 
- Umbilical cord. 
- Woman produces milk that has everything the baby needs. 
 
(The points above don&#039;t even cover how a creature would go from asexual to sexual. Hormones. X and Y chromosomes etc) it&#039;s a bit more than russian roulette sir. It is a highly complex process. 
 
Remember evolution is an unguided unintelligent process. All of these factors have to be in play at the same time otherwise the &#039;species&#039; fails to reproduce and dies off. 
 
This is the point I am trying to get across to you. You have to have a huge amount of faith to believe that this happened by chance. Do you agree? 
 
O and thanks for questioning this because I never realised how incredible this process is! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all you didn&#039;t explain anything about evolution, you are just stating how the reproductive system works. </p>
<p>Please tell me how all these factors evolved at the same time: </p>
<p>- Female is born with eggs already with her chromosomes inside.<br />
- Female releases only one egg per cycle.<br />
- Man producing semen with his chromosomes inside.<br />
- Man being able to pass semen out of his body.<br />
- Sperm must be able to swim.<br />
- Seminal fluids contain fructose sugar providing the sperm with energy on its long journey to the ovum.<br />
- The vagina is strongly acidic to prevent bacterial infection. It is a hostile environment for sperm (the seminal fluids counteract this acidity by producing alkaline to protect the semen).<br />
- Gametes (the male sperm and the female egg) contain only half the normal number of chromosomes, 23 instead of 46.<br />
- Sperm has correct enzyme on head that can penetrate egg wall.<br />
- Sperm and egg must fuse so that their nuclei become one.<br />
- Fertilized egg must attach to the uterus wall.<br />
- It will also continue to produce progesterone which stabilises conditions inside the uterus until birth.<br />
- Placenta.<br />
- Umbilical cord.<br />
- Woman produces milk that has everything the baby needs. </p>
<p>(The points above don&#039;t even cover how a creature would go from asexual to sexual. Hormones. X and Y chromosomes etc) it&#039;s a bit more than russian roulette sir. It is a highly complex process. </p>
<p>Remember evolution is an unguided unintelligent process. All of these factors have to be in play at the same time otherwise the &#039;species&#039; fails to reproduce and dies off. </p>
<p>This is the point I am trying to get across to you. You have to have a huge amount of faith to believe that this happened by chance. Do you agree? </p>
<p>O and thanks for questioning this because I never realised how incredible this process is!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Creation Evidence by Frank</title>
		<link>http://thebibleisthewordofgod.com/evolution/creation-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebibleisthewordofgod.com/?page_id=36#comment-46</guid>
		<description>This process is a lot less random than you think.  Sure the sperm and egg contain DNA, but so do the rest of the cells in the body.   And, yes, the sperm can swim and find it&#039;s way, but millions of the little guys never make past the vagina, likewise into the tiny fallopian tube to meet with the egg.  Most are too weak, malformed, or just confused to find their way.  Plus, they must be inserted into the proper channels to have a chance at this journey at all.  As for your statement, that the woman&#039;s egg &quot;knows to let the sperm in&quot; I think you&#039;re also giving the egg a lot more credit than it really deserves.  The head of the sperm is capped with an enzyme, called acrosome, which dissolved a hole through the wall of the egg.  This is a simple chemical cause and effect process.  Multiple sperm begin this process and the first to fully penetrate the barrier wins.  This is all kinds of random chance here! 
 
Just because you can&#039;t understand the process by which something evolved doesn&#039;t, doesn&#039;t mean that some being designed it.  Do you really think this process that quite resembles Russian Roulette was really designed? If you were god, would you leave all of those things up to chance? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This process is a lot less random than you think.  Sure the sperm and egg contain DNA, but so do the rest of the cells in the body.   And, yes, the sperm can swim and find it&#39;s way, but millions of the little guys never make past the vagina, likewise into the tiny fallopian tube to meet with the egg.  Most are too weak, malformed, or just confused to find their way.  Plus, they must be inserted into the proper channels to have a chance at this journey at all.  As for your statement, that the woman&#39;s egg &quot;knows to let the sperm in&quot; I think you&#39;re also giving the egg a lot more credit than it really deserves.  The head of the sperm is capped with an enzyme, called acrosome, which dissolved a hole through the wall of the egg.  This is a simple chemical cause and effect process.  Multiple sperm begin this process and the first to fully penetrate the barrier wins.  This is all kinds of random chance here! </p>
<p>Just because you can&#39;t understand the process by which something evolved doesn&#39;t, doesn&#39;t mean that some being designed it.  Do you really think this process that quite resembles Russian Roulette was really designed? If you were god, would you leave all of those things up to chance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Creation Evidence by futureisbright</title>
		<link>http://thebibleisthewordofgod.com/evolution/creation-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>futureisbright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 19:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebibleisthewordofgod.com/?page_id=36#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Frank, think about it for a minute or two:  
  
A man&#039;s body creates sperm which contains his dna and it can swim and find its way to the woman&#039;s egg. A woman&#039;s body produces eggs that contain her dna and it knows to let sperm inside its cell wall. Then the sperm and the egg combine their dna to make a new human being.  
  
No way can that happen by random mutations, come on man </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank, think about it for a minute or two:  </p>
<p>A man&#39;s body creates sperm which contains his dna and it can swim and find its way to the woman&#39;s egg. A woman&#39;s body produces eggs that contain her dna and it knows to let sperm inside its cell wall. Then the sperm and the egg combine their dna to make a new human being.  </p>
<p>No way can that happen by random mutations, come on man</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Creation Evidence by Frank</title>
		<link>http://thebibleisthewordofgod.com/evolution/creation-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 19:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebibleisthewordofgod.com/?page_id=36#comment-44</guid>
		<description>&quot;The fact that a man and a woman can come together as one is a wonderful thing&#8230; why would that happen by chance?&quot;  Are you serious?  Mixing of DNA is vital to adaptation and evolution.     
 
The light that the firefly emits is a mixture of some specialized chemicals and semen.  It is a way to attract a mate and expand the gene pool.  Nothing magical about it. 
 
This article is complete nonsense!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;The fact that a man and a woman can come together as one is a wonderful thing&hellip; why would that happen by chance?&quot;  Are you serious?  Mixing of DNA is vital to adaptation and evolution.     </p>
<p>The light that the firefly emits is a mixture of some specialized chemicals and semen.  It is a way to attract a mate and expand the gene pool.  Nothing magical about it. </p>
<p>This article is complete nonsense!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why do muslims behead people by futureisbright</title>
		<link>http://thebibleisthewordofgod.com/2009/07/muslims-behead-people-for-being-christian/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>futureisbright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebibleisthewordofgod.com/?p=175#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Four Christians working in Somalia to provide services to orphans have been executed by beheading by al-Qaida-linked interests who told their families that is the penalty for apostasy. Read it here &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=106597&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pag...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Four Christians working in Somalia to provide services to orphans have been executed by beheading by al-Qaida-linked interests who told their families that is the penalty for apostasy. Read it here <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=106597" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pag.." rel="nofollow">http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pag..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on God created the plants and trees before He created the Sun? by Ginger</title>
		<link>http://thebibleisthewordofgod.com/2009/06/god-created-the-plants-and-trees-before-he-created-the-sun/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Ginger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebibleisthewordofgod.com/?p=89#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Very nice answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Did rainbows only happen after Noah&#8217;s flood? by Ginger</title>
		<link>http://thebibleisthewordofgod.com/2009/06/did-rainbows-only-happen-after-noahs-flood/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Ginger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebibleisthewordofgod.com/?p=84#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Just because God chose a rainbow as a sign of his covenant does not mean that they didn&#039;t exist before that time.  The passage doesn&#039;t say that a rainbow was never seen before that time.  The person who asked this question is making assumptions that have no basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because God chose a rainbow as a sign of his covenant does not mean that they didn&#8217;t exist before that time.  The passage doesn&#8217;t say that a rainbow was never seen before that time.  The person who asked this question is making assumptions that have no basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
